The Center today defended the sedition law and asked the Supreme Court to dismiss the petitions challenging it. The court is hearing petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the colonial-era law.
In a written submission, the Center told a three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice NV Ramana that the decision to uphold the sedition law in Kedarnath Singh v State of Bihar is binding. It also said that the three-judge bench cannot examine the validity of the law. “A Constitutional Bench has already examined all aspects of Section 124A (Sedition Act) with reference to fundamental rights like right to equality and right to life,” the government told the Supreme Court.
The petitions challenging the sedition law were filed by five parties including the Editors Guild of India and Trinamool MP Mahua Moitra.
A three-judge special bench comprising Chief Justice NV Ramana and Justices Surya Kant and Hima Kohli on Tuesday heard the petitions challenging the validity of the sedition law.
Concerned over the rampant misuse of the penal law on sedition, the apex court had in July last year asked the Center why it was not repeal the provision used by the British to silence people like Mahatma Gandhi to suppress the freedom movement. Was.
While agreeing to consider the petitions, the court had said that its main concern is “abuse of law” due to which the number of cases is increasing.
‘या लेखात समाविष्ट असलेल्या कोणत्याही माहिती/सामग्री/गणनाची अचूकता किंवा विश्वसनीयता हमी नाही. ही माहिती विविध माध्यमे / ज्योतिषी / पंचांग / प्रवचन / विश्वास / धर्मग्रंथांमधून गोळा करून तुमच्यासाठी आणली गेली आहे. आमचा हेतू फक्त माहिती पोहोचवणे आहे, त्याच्या वापरकर्त्यांनी ती फक्त माहिती म्हणून घ्यावी. याव्यतिरिक्त, त्याचा कोणताही वापर वापरकर्त्याची स्वतःची जबाबदारी असेल. ‘
‘The accuracy or reliability of any information/material/calculation contained in this article is not guaranteed. This information has been brought to you by collecting from various mediums / astrologers / almanacs / discourses / beliefs / scriptures. Our purpose is only to deliver information, its users should take it as mere information. In addition, any use thereof shall be the responsibility of the user himself.’